Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Something Christlike

John M. Buchanan is the editor and publisher of The Christian Century. His editorial for the July 29, 2008 issue is entitled "Something Christlike." In it, Buchanan shares how one Episcopal Church bounced back from the brink of closure by living into the Gospel mandate of Matthew 25:31-46. It's an inspiring story that shows what it means to take the work of the Church in the world seriously. It also touches on "the long emergency" of increasing energy costs, the repercussions of which all churches are going to have to find ways to address if we are going to be faithful to our Lord and have a relevant witness to the world.

The version of Christianity that appears in the media often embarrasses me: it's narrow, sectarian, exclusive and sometimes mean-spirited. So it was a joy to find in the May 26 New Yorker an article by novelist Ian Frazier about a church being a church in the best sense.

Frazier conducts a weekly writing workshop at a church soup kitchen in New York City, and he regularly encounters gifted men and women who, for one reason or another, are homeless and hungry. The Church of the Holy Apostles is a landmark, with a high arched ceiling and gorgeous stained-glass windows. Over the years the Episcopal congregation dwindled in size as the neighborhood changed until the 200 members could no longer afford to pay the bills to keep it going. A new rector suggested that "if Holy Apostles is going out of business, it might as well do some good before it does."

So in 1982 the church launched a free-lunch program. Thirty-five people showed up. The program grew and attracted more people and outside support. In a few years the congregation was serving 900 lunches daily and bursting the seams of its mission house.

In 1990, during roof repairs to the main sanctuary, a fire broke out that caused major damage. During insurance-covered restoration and renovation, and while the pews were out, members came up with an idea: Why not leave the pews out and use the worship space, which was empty and unused Monday through Friday, for the lunch program?

Now the church is serving 1,200 meals a day. Volunteers do most of the work. They take the tables down on Friday afternoon and set up folding chairs for the weekend. The budget is now $2.7 million, which comes from businesses, foundations, the city—and the 200 members, who, instead of closing down a church, are part of a vital and compelling community of faith.

The program rules are simple: no proselytizing and no one turned away. If anyone wants more food, that person can go outside, stand in line, get another ticket and eat again. Frazier asked Elizabeth Maxwell of the Holy Apostles staff about the religious motivation behind the program. She said: "Well, we do this because Jesus said to feed the hungry. There's no more to it than that. Jesus told us to take care of the poor and hungry and those in prison. . . . In all the intricacies of scriptural interpretation, that message—feed the hungry—could not be more clear. Those of us at Holy Apostles feel we have a Sunday-Monday connection. The bread and wine of the Eucharist we share on Sunday becomes the food we share with our neighbors during the week."

There has long been an important debate in the church about whether its mandate is to feed the hungry or to address the social, economic and political structures that cause people to be hungry. We are in a major global food crisis, the reasons for which are complex—including the rising cost of oil, which has an impact on the cost of fertilizer and transportation. It is a crisis that ultimately will not be addressed by food aid. If you want to take Jesus' moral imperative seriously, sooner or later you have to think about politics and economics.

In the meantime, it is important that the world see in the church something of the kindness, compassion and justice of Jesus which is behind the advocacy for social and political change. It's a matter of both/and.

Maybe the world would find churches more interesting and compelling if they showed something of the love of Jesus in their lives and practices. Maybe there is no more important and life-giving strategy for every church than finding something Christlike to do.

Copyright 2006 CHRISTIAN CENTURY. Reproduced by permission from the July 29, 2008 issue of the CHRISTIAN CENTURY. Subscriptions: $49/year from P.O. Box 378, Mt. Morris, IL 61054. 1-800-208-4097

1 comment:

Craig Goodrich said...

The difficulty with "the Church" getting involved in politics, at least at the national level, is that even the most casual reading of history shows that it's the politics that consume the Church, rather than vice-versa. Rather like the old joke about the zookeeper's response to the question about their "lion lying down with the lamb" display -- "Well, it's easy. But we do go through a lot of lambs..."

It's easy and tempting to hobnob with powerful politicians. But reform of the culture is much more difficult; the only effective way to do it is to increase your efforts at Christian formation to the point that when one of your parishioners becomes a Public Servant (as we call them, with increasing irony), his Christian values will inform anything he does.

Otherwise you can pretty much count on going the way of the Byzantine Church, which throughout its history gave its blessing to the most atrocious acts of the Emperor. Not to mention the Nazi Volkskirche or the glorious sport of burning heretics that was so popular in the 16th century, or the Inquisition. And of course, the Crucifixion itself was due to the Church taking its problems to the political authorities...